The reference to treaty obligations in the penultimate sentence of Article 10(1) does not include decisions taken by international organisations, even if they are legally binding, or treaties which entered into force before 1 January 1970.
(1) Disputes between a Contracting Party and an Investor of another Contracting Party relating to an Investment of the latter in the Area of the former, which concern an alleged breach of an obligation of the former under Part III shall, if possible, be settled amicably.
(2) If such disputes cannot be settled according to the provisions of paragraph (1) within a period of three months from the date on which either party to the dispute requested amicable settlement, the Investor party to the dispute may choose to submit it for resolution:
Article 26(2)(a) should not be interpreted to require a Contracting Party to enact Part III of the Treaty into its domestic law.
(3)
(a) Subject only to subparagraphs (b) and (c), each Contracting Party hereby gives its unconditional consent to the submission of a dispute to international arbitration or conciliation in accordance with the provisions of this Article.
(b)
(c) A Contracting Party listed in Annex IA does not give such unconditional consent with respect to a dispute arising under the last sentence of Article 10(1).
(4) In the event that an Investor chooses to submit the dispute for resolution under subparagraph (2)(c), the Investor shall further provide its consent in writing for the dispute to be submitted to:
(a)
(b) a sole arbitrator or ad hoc arbitration tribunal established under the Arbitration Rules of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (hereinafter referred to as “UNCITRAL”); or
(c) an arbitral proceeding under the Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce.
(5)
(a) The consent given in paragraph (3) together with the written consent of the Investor given pursuant to paragraph (4) shall be considered to satisfy the requirement for:
(b) Any arbitration under this Article shall at the request of any party to the dispute be held in a state that is a party to the New York Convention. Claims submitted to arbitration hereunder shall be considered to arise out of a commercial relationship or transaction for the purposes of article I of that Convention.
(6) A tribunal established under paragraph (4) shall decide the issues in dispute in accordance with this Treaty and applicable rules and principles of international law.
(7) An Investor other than a natural person which has the nationality of a Contracting Party party to the dispute on the date of the consent in writing referred to in paragraph (4) and which, before a dispute between it and that Contracting Party arises, is controlled by Investors of another Contracting Party, shall for the purpose of article 25(2)(b) of the ICSID Convention be treated as a “national of another Contracting State” and shall for the purpose of article 1(6) of the Additional Facility Rules be treated as a “national of another State”.
(8) The awards of arbitration, which may include an award of interest, shall be final and binding upon the parties to the dispute. An award of arbitration concerning a measure of a sub-national government or authority of the disputing Contracting Party shall provide that the Contracting Party may pay monetary damages in lieu of any other remedy granted. Each Contracting Party shall carry out without delay any such award and shall make provision for the effective enforcement in its Area of such awards.
AES Corporation and Tau Power B.V. v. Republic of Kazakhstan, ICSID Case No. ARB/10/16
Award, 1 November 2013, paragraph 188-193; 198
Award, 23 September 2010, paragraphs 6.16; 6.3.3; 6.4.1-6.4.2; 7.6.2-.6.12
Alapli Elektrik B.V. v. Republic of Turkey, ICSID Case No. ARB/08/13
Excerpts of Award, 16 July 2012, paragraphs 315; 381
Dissenting Opinion of Marc Lalonde, 16 July 2012, paragraphs 5
Mohammad Ammar Al-Bahloul v. Republic of Tajikistan, SCC Case No. V064/2008
Partial Award on Jurisdiction and Liability, 2 September 2009, paragraphs 113; 122-126; 140; 148-149; 158; 160-164
Award, 8 June 2010, paragraphs 40-42
Limited Liability Company Amto v. Ukraine, SCC Case No. 080/2005
Award, 26 March 2008, paragraphs 46-53; 56
Award, 19 December 2013, paragraphs 708-709; 851-8
Award, 15 June 2018, paragraphs 210-212; 218-224; 316
Award, 8 September 2009, paragraph 105
Blusun S.A., Jean-Pierre Lecorcier and Michael Stein v. Italian Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/14/3
Final Award, 27 December 2016, paragraphs 264; 271-273; 286; 289
Cem Cengiz Uzan v. Republic of Turkey, SCC Case No. V 2014/023
Award on Respondent's Preliminary Objections, 20 April 2016, paragraph 135; 140-156; 165; 184-187
Cementownia "Nowa Huta" S.A. v. Republic of Turkey, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/06/2
Award, 17 September 2009, paragraphs 113-114; 147-149
Charanne and Construction Investments v. Spain, SCC Case No. V 062/2012
Award, 21 January 2016, paragraph 400; 417; 428-432; 438-439; 447
Award, 4 May 2017, paragraphs 194-199; 320; 345
Electrabel S.A. v. Republic of Hungary, ICSID Case No. ARB/07/19
Decision on Jurisdiction, Applicable law and Admissibility, 30 November 2012, paragraph 4.112; 4.119-4.146
Energoalians SARL v. Republic of Moldova, UNCITRAL
Award, 23 October 2013, Paragraphs 121-122; 131
Dissenting Opinion of Dominic Pellew, 23 October 2013, paragraphs 43-48
State Enterprise "Energorynok" (Ukraine) v. The Republic of Moldova, SCC Arbitration V 2012/175
Final Award, 29 January 2015, paragraphs 56-58; 90; 101
Eskosol S.p.A. in liquidazione v. Italian Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/50
Decision on Respondent's Application under Rule 41(5), 20 March 2017, paragraphs 87-89; 101-102
Europe Cement Investment & Trade S.A. v. the Republic of Turkey, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/07/2
Award, 13 August 2009, paragraphs 140-142
Greentech AS and others v Spain, SCC Arbitration V (2015/150)
Final Award, 14 November 2018, paragraphs 209-219
Partial Dissenting Opinion of Raul Vicuesa, 30 October 2018, paragraphs 1-11
Hulley Enterprises Limited (Cyprus) v. Russian Federation, PCA Case No. AA 226
Interim Award on Jurisdiction and Admissibility, 30 November 2009, paragraph 76
Final Award, 18 July 2014, paragraphs 348; 382; 388-390; 1343-1346; 1352; 1355; 1358-1353; 1364; 1370
Memorandum Opinion, US District Court of Columbia, 30 September 2016, p. 16
Isolux Netherlands, BV v. Kingdom of Spain, SCC Case V2013/153
Final Award, 17 July 2016, paragraphs 634-636; 644-654; 696-703
Ioannis Kardassopoulos v. The Republic of Georgia, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/18
Decision on Jurisdiction, 6 July 2007, paragraphs 145-146; 194; 196; 230; 247-248
Award, 3 March 2010, paragraph 211
Decision on Jurisdiction, 25 July 2012, paragraphs 326; 383-388; 437-438
Libananco Holdings Co. Limited v. Republic of Turkey, ICSID Case No. ARB/06/8
Award, 2 September 2011, paragraphs 121; 536; 539-547
Liman Caspian Oil BV and NCL Dutch Investment BV v. Republic of Kazakhstan, ICSID Case No. ARB/07/14
Excerpts of Award, 22 June 2010, Paragraphs 57; 187; 193-194
Award, 30 March 2015, paragraphs 276-278; 293-294; 372-373; 375-378; 469; 480-495
Masdar Solar & Wind Cooperatief U.A. v. Kingdom of Spain, ICSID Case No. ARB/14/1
Award, 16 May 2018, paragraphs 313; 321-323; 332-340
Award, 15 February 2018, paragraph 449-453; 459-466
Nykomb Synergetics Technology Holding AB v. The Republic of Latvia, SCC
Award, 16 December 2003, paragraphs 2.2-2.3; 4.3.3
Petrobart Limited v. The Kyrgyz Republic, SCC Case No. 126/2003
Award, 29 March 2005, page 64-66
Plama Consortium Limited v. Republic of Bulgaria, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/24
Decision on Jurisdiction, 8 February 2005, paragraphs 118; 130-141
Decision on Jurisdiction, 6 June 2016, paragraph 75-90; 197
Veteran Petroleum Limited (Cyprus) v. Russian Federation, PCA Case No. AA 228
Interim Award on Jurisdiction and Admissibility, 30 November 2009, paragraph 76
Final Award, 18 July 2014, paragraphs 348; 382; 388-390; 1343-1346; 1352; 1355; 1358-1353; 1364; 1370
Memorandum Opinion, US District Court of Columbia, 30 September 2016, p. 16
Yukos Universal Limited (Isle of Man) v. Russian Federation, PCA Case No. AA 227
Interim Award on Jurisdiction and Admissibility, 30 November 2009, paragraphs76
Final Award, 18 July 2014, paragraphs 348; 382; 388-390; 1343-1346; 1352; 1355; 1358-1353; 1364; 1370
Memorandum Opinion, US District Court of Columbia, 30 September 2016, p. 16